Scholars Warn of Predatory Journals Advocate for JETIR

Academic publishing presents both opportunities and challenges for researchers worldwide. Many scholars find themselves at a crossroads when selecting publication platforms, facing the dilemma of distinguishing reputable journals from questionable ones. This article examines potential risks associated with certain academic journals, using JETIR (Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research) as a case study, while providing practical guidance for researchers.

The Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) presents itself as an attractive publication option, advertising UGC approval, peer-review processes, and high impact factors. However, researchers should carefully evaluate several aspects before considering submission.

JETIR prominently displays its "UGC approved" status on its website. The University Grants Commission (UGC) serves as India's higher education accreditation body. While UGC approval can indicate legitimacy, researchers should independently verify this claim through the official UGC website, as approved journal lists undergo regular updates.

The journal claims an impact factor of 7.95, allegedly calculated through Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar. However, legitimate impact factors originate from Clarivate Analytics through the Web of Science database. Researchers should verify impact factors through official channels rather than relying on journal-reported metrics.

JETIR's website demonstrates heavy keyword repetition ("UGC CARE," "peer-reviewed," etc.), characteristic of search engine optimization tactics rather than academic focus. This approach may raise questions about the journal's primary objectives.

The journal advertises publication within 1-2 days of document submission. While appealing to time-sensitive researchers, such accelerated timelines often indicate compromised peer-review processes, potentially undermining academic credibility.

As an open-access journal, JETIR charges article processing fees, a common practice. However, when revenue generation appears prioritized over academic rigor, journals risk becoming "predatory" publications that exploit researchers without providing legitimate scholarly value.

Beyond JETIR, researchers should remain vigilant for these warning signs:

• Opaque or nonexistent peer-review processes
• Overemphasis on rapid publication timelines
• Exorbitant publication fees without corresponding quality
• Poor website design with grammatical errors
• Lack of recognition within academic communities

Choosing suitable journals requires careful consideration:

• Investigate journal reputation through Web of Science, Scopus, or expert consultation
• Thoroughly review submission guidelines and editorial policies
• Select journals aligned with your research specialization
• Avoid known predatory publishers that prioritize profit over scholarship

Academic integrity forms the foundation of scholarly research. By carefully evaluating publication options and avoiding questionable journals, researchers contribute to maintaining high standards in academic discourse. Thoughtful journal selection and commitment to quality scholarship ultimately advance knowledge across all disciplines.